We all now Windows Live Messenger. As a matter of fact, it’s the most used IM client world-wide, and with the release of Windows Live Essentials 2009, Microsoft took it’s cool tools to a higher level. My concern this time is Windows Live Messenger, as I’m forced to use it on regularly basis because many of my contacts don’t really use anything else instead.
Live Messenger has very nice features, and the UI of the 2009 version is simply amazing. There is one thing, however, it’s not perfect as it should have become for all this darn years. For instance, it doesn’t yes offer polygamy (you have to get a patch for it), censored file type transfer, number of simultaneous transfers etc.
I remember couple of months back when they improved the UI of Windows Live Hotmail, first thing that I had to confront with was a screen with an announcement. What caught my eye was a single line saying: “You spoke. We listened.” They may have listened, but not enough I suppose.
Now lets get back to Messenger. See, I suggested a feature, well it isn’t maybe a feature but more of an improvement. I’m talking about the ability to choose different picture for different chat window, instead of using the same image for all windows. It may not matter to somebody, but it does have an importance to me. Imagine this, if you’re talking to somebody you know, and put your personal picture on chat, but there’s someone else you don’t know and you don’t prefer to expose your self to him/her. Which you’d prefer in such situations, Arian’s or Microsoft’s idea. I mean come on, it’s not hell of an innovation, but a small thing that a corporate of people should have thought before me. Or do they have a particular reason not to do so? If you know or something I’d be thankful to tell me, until then I firmly stick to my suggestion.
It’s ridiculous to think of how long I’ve been hoping since my last feedback addressing Live Messenger. This feature should have accompanied Messenger IM Client ever since. Indeed, I wrote two times and was totally ignored. Well, Microsoft, if you say you listen, I recommend you open up your ears a lot more than you do, because I spoke and that twice.
P.S. Few days ago, Microsoft had forced users of previous Windows Live Messenger 2009 builds (i.e. 14.0.8050.1202 and below) to upgrade to the version 14.0.8064.0206. It makes me wonder, if they can do that for Live Messenger, why not do the same for IE6?!
You tell me. I’d like to hear your thoughts on this.